Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 98.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 8.04 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Phantom black and Silver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 966.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 Ultra has an overall score of 98.1, which is way better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play's global score of 77.4. Galaxy S21 Ultra's body is a lot newer, but a lot thicker and a lot heavier than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. Galaxy S21 Ultra features an incredibly better display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bigger screen, a much higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a better display pixels density.
The Galaxy S21 Ultra has a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S21 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos, it also counts with a back facing camera with much more megapixels and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution. Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S21 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z2 Play. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Moto Z2 Play, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.