Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is a lot better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, with a 93.4 score against 77.4. Even though Galaxy S22 is notably newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, it's extremely thicker and heavier. Galaxy S22 counts with a much better looking display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a bit bigger display and a little higher display density.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a superior storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S22 features a way better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a way better video quality. Samsung Galaxy S22 features longer battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy S22, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Moto Z2 Play, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.