Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than Moto Z2 Play, with a general score of 95.4 against 77.4. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is extremely newer, but extremely thicker and heavier than Moto Z2 Play. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit better processor than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better looking screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bigger display, a bit higher pixels amount in each screen inch and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. The Moto Z2 Play has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot better 108 MP resolution back-facing camera and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto Z2 Play. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy S22 Ultra, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Moto Z2 Play, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.