Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-06-29 | -- |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | -- |
| 5.11 ounces | -- |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | -- |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has a general score of 82.6, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 global score. Galaxy S25's construction is a lot thinner and a lot lighter than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a lot better looking display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a little bigger screen and a just a bit higher pixel number per screen inch.
The Moto Z2 Play features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S25, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with an extremely better processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 takes much better pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light captures, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera. Galaxy S25 features greater battery duration than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 33% bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Motorola Moto Z2 Play, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.