Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-06-29 | -- |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | -- |
| 5.11 ounces | -- |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | -- |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is much better than the Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 score. Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is way lighter and a lot thinner than the Moto Z2 Play. Galaxy S25 Ultra has an incredibly better screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bit higher pixels quantity per inch of screen, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a larger screen.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z2 Play features a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a very superior camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much longer battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.