Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Blue and Red |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 Sport is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, getting a general score of 77.8 against 77.4. Despite being the best we compare here, the Galaxy S5 Sport is a way older, way thicker and a bit heavier phone than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. Galaxy S5 Sport has a brighter screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1920 x 1080 resolution, the Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features just a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has less cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processor. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a bit better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a way tinier aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution.
Motorola Moto Z2 Play features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 48 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 3000mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Although Galaxy S5 Sport is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy S5 Sport, else you can save some dollars and buy the Moto Z2 Play, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.