Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's general score of 77.4. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, it is thicker and a lot heavier. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a bit better looking screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a little bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a bigger display and a just a bit better pixels density.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 12 megapixels, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has a bigger aperture to capture better images and video in low light situations.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.