Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 score. Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, it's somewhat thicker and extremely heavier. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better looking screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of display, a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a bigger display. Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photos or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rates.
The Moto Z2 Play features a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 10% more battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z2 Play. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.