Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than the Moto Z2 Play, getting a general score of 94.6 against 77.4. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is way newer, but somewhat thicker and notably heavier than Moto Z2 Play. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a little better processing power than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little bit better looking screen than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a just a bit inferior count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a much bigger screen and a higher 1768 x 2208 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a 12 MP back facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Moto Z2 Play has a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much longer battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 50% larger battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto Z2 Play. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.