Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than Moto Z2 Play, with a 90.6 score against 77.4. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 3 is notably newer than the Moto Z2 Play, it's a little bit thicker and a lot heavier. Motorola Moto Z2 Play and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 feature really similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little bit inferior pixels amount per inch of screen, it also counts with a lot larger screen and a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play features more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit better processor than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Moto Z2 Play captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has a lot bigger aperture for better photos in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.