Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Play is slightly better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, getting a overall score of 77.4 against 76.1. Moto Z2 Play is an notably older phone than TCL 20 Pro 5G, but Motorola was able to make it noticeably thinner and extremely lighter anyway. TCL 20 Pro 5G's CPU is very similar to the processor in Moto Z2 Play, and although the TCL 20 Pro 5G has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
TCL 20 Pro 5G features a display that is very similar to Moto Z2 Play's screen, because although the TCL 20 Pro 5G has a quite lower screen density, it also counts with a larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. TCL 20 Pro 5G takes a lot better pictures and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also counts with a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
TCL 20 Pro 5G has a superior memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a SD card slot that holds 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 50% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.