Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Blasting black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, having a global score of 90.1 against 77.4. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's design is newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's, although it's noticeably thicker and heavier. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a little bit better processing power than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bigger display, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a quite greater number of pixels in each inch of display. Moto Z2 Play has a better memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro shoots way better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a way higher resolution back camera.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.