Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-06-29 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is just a bit better than the Moto Z2 Play, having a overall score of 82.7 against 77.4. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's design is a lot newer than Moto Z2 Play's, although it's thicker and way heavier. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a bit sharper display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a little higher amount of pixels in each inch in the display, a larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with better video frame rates and a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.