Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than the Moto Z2 Play, having a general score of 87.9 against 77.4. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's construction is extremely newer, but much heavier and extremely thicker than the Moto Z2 Play. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit better screen than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a quite worse pixel amount per display inch, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger display. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a way better camera than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking images and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much longer battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 57% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.