Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-06-29 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a general score of 81.6, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play's 77.4 global score. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC design is noticeably newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play's, but it is notably heavier and much thicker. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has more RAM.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a just a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Moto Z2 Play has a much better storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z2 Play also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a way better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution back camera.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a very superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.