Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro Max is better than the Moto Z3 Play, having an 85.3 score against 76.3. The iPhone 11 Pro Max body is newer than the Moto Z3 Play's, but it is a lot heavier and somewhat thicker. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a faster processor than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bit processor.
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a more vivid screen than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little bit greater screen density, a bit larger display and a higher 1242 x 2688 resolution. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light images and videos, and they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, the same video resolution and a camera with a 12 megapixels, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with better video frame rates.
The Moto Z3 Play has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z3 Play also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features greater battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 3969mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto Z3 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z3 Play. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto Z3 Play, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.