Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 16.x |
| 2018-06-29 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro is way better than Moto Z3 Play, having a global score of 95.6 against 76.3. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro body is noticeably newer, but incredibly heavier and thicker than Moto Z3 Play. Apple iPhone 14 Pro has an incredibly better screen than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a bit bigger screen, a quite better 1179 x 2556 resolution and a bit better screen pixels density.
The Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a superior memory for applications and games than Apple iPhone 14 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The iPhone 14 Pro has an extremely better processing unit than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU and 2 GB more RAM memory.
IPhone 14 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking images and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the iPhone 14 Pro also counts with a much more mega pixels back facing camera and higher 60 fps video frame rates.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro has just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity.
IPhone 14 Pro is way more expensive than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.