Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-04-24 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone SE (2020) has a score of 81.5, which is just a bit better than Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 overall score. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) is a newer and just a little lighter phone than the Moto Z3 Play, but it's just a little thicker. Apple iPhone SE (2020) features a better processing power than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Apple iPhone SE (2020) features a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, although it has a way lower resolution of 750 x 1334px, a lot smaller display and a bit less pixels per display inch. The iPhone SE (2020) features a bit better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and/or video in low-light situations and a smaller sensor capturing worse quality images, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a 12 MP resolution back facing camera, the iPhone SE (2020) also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Moto Z3 Play counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone SE (2020), and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z3 Play also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z3 Play has a way better battery life than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has a 65 percent more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, iPhone SE (2020) is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.