Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2018-06-29 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is much better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 score. Despite being the best in this review, it must be told that it's also somewhat heavier and a little thicker. The iPhone X has a greater processing power than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and 2 lesser cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Apple iPhone X features a much better looking screen than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a just a bit better display pixel density. The Motorola Moto Z3 Play counts with a better storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone X, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
IPhone X features a little bit better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video and a smaller back-facing camera sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality, and they both have a 12 mega-pixels camera and the same video quality, the iPhone X also counts with better video frame rate.
The Moto Z3 Play counts with just a little better battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 10 percent bigger battery size.
Apple iPhone X is a lot more expensive than Moto Z3 Play, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.