Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2018-06-29 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR has an overall score of 82, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 score. The Apple iPhone XR is a somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker device than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play. The Apple iPhone XR has a more powerful CPU than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone XR counts with just a bit better looking screen than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a much lower 828 x 1792 pixels resolution and a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display. The Moto Z3 Play has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z3 Play also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
IPhone XR counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, a camera in the back with a 12 MP and a 0.39 inches sensor, the iPhone XR also counts with higher video frame rates.
The iPhone XR has a battery lifetime that is just as good as the battery life in Moto Z3 Play, although the iPhone XR has just 2942mAh of battery capacity.
IPhone XR costs a lot more than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.