Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play's overall score of 76.3. Google Pixel 4 is a newer cellphone than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, although it's just a little heavier and somewhat thicker. The Google Pixel 4 has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels.
Motorola Moto Z3 Play has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z3 Play also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4 has a little faster processing unit than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM.
The Moto Z3 Play counts with just a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same aperture, a same size back camera sensor, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher 12.2 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Google Pixel 4 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.