Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 overall score. Although Google Pixel 4 XL is newer than Moto Z3 Play, it's somewhat heavier and thicker. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little bit bigger display, a higher 1440 x 3040px resolution and a higher pixels density.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a little bit better camera than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a 0.39 inches back camera sensor, the same video frame rates, the same video quality and the same aperture, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a camera in the back with more mega-pixels.
Motorola Moto Z3 Play counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z3 Play also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with superior battery life than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 23% greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 4 XL is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.