Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is much better than Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 score. The Google Pixel 4a 5G construction is noticeably newer than Moto Z3 Play's, although it is somewhat thicker and a little heavier. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has just a bit better processing power than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better looking display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a just a bit better pixel count in each inch of display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit larger display. The Google Pixel 4a 5G takes a bit better videos and photos than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same video quality, a same size sensor and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher 12.2 megapixels resolution back camera and higher video frame rate.
The Moto Z3 Play has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with greater battery lifetime than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G and the Moto Z3 Play cost exactly the same, which makes it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.