Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than Moto Z3 Play, getting a global score of 89 against 76.3. The Google Pixel 5 design is way newer and just a little lighter than Moto Z3 Play's, although it is also somewhat thicker. Google Pixel 5 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Google Pixel 5 also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Motorola Moto Z3 Play counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 5 has a bit better processing power than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM.
Google Pixel 5 shoots slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a same size diafragm aperture and the same sensor size, the Google Pixel 5 also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a camera with a better resolution.
Google Pixel 5 features a much longer battery duration than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 36 percent larger battery size.
The Google Pixel 5 is a little more expensive than Moto Z3 Play, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.