Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 402 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has an overall score of 92.1, which is much better than Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 general score. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design construction is way newer than Moto Z3 Play's, although it is notably thicker and incredibly heavier. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a better processing unit than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a larger amount of RAM.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a way better looking display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little bigger display, a quite higher pixels density and a higher 1280 x 2800 resolution. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a way more mega-pixels back camera, a lot bigger camera sensor and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 1 TB internal storage capacity. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a really longer battery lifetime than Moto Z3 Play, because it has an 87% bigger battery capacity.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z3 Play, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.