Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-06-29 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a general score of 82.5, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play's general score of 76.3. Although the LG V30S ThinQ is better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, we must tell that it is also a just a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone. The LG V30S ThinQ has a little bit better performance than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a greater pixels quantity per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. The LG V30S ThinQ has more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 128 GB internal memory.
The LG V30S ThinQ captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a larger camera aperture and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a bit better battery life than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto Z3 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z3 Play. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Moto Z3 Play, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.