Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2018-06-29 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Moto Z3 Play, having a score of 81.3 against 76.3. The LG V35 ThinQ design is a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier than the Moto Z3 Play. LG V35 ThinQ has a little more vivid display than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a better screen density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The LG V35 ThinQ's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as Motorola Moto Z3 Play's one, both have an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and equal 64 GB internal storage capacity. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little faster processor than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ captures a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a way better 16 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 10% greater battery capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.