Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than Moto Z3 Play's global score of 76.3. LG V40 ThinQ's construction is just a bit heavier and a little bit thicker than the Moto Z3 Play. The LG V40 ThinQ has a slightly better display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little bigger screen, a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
LG V40 ThinQ features as much storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as Moto Z3 Play, they have a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and the same internal storage. The LG V40 ThinQ has a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG V40 ThinQ features just a bit better battery lifetime than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. The LG V40 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting worse quality images, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera and the same (4K) video resolution, the LG V40 ThinQ also counts with higher video frame rate and a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low light environments.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, LG V40 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to others, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.