Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 9.68 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, having an 87.6 score against 76.3. Although the LG V60 ThinQ is newer than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, it's way thicker and noticeably heavier. LG V60 ThinQ features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a just a little lower pixels quantity per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460px.
The LG V60 ThinQ has more storage capacity for apps and games than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG V60 ThinQ has a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG V60 ThinQ shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a much larger sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures, a back camera with a lot better 64 MP resolution and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a way better battery lifetime than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 67 percent greater battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.