Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is better than the Moto Z3 Play's global score of 76.3. LG Velvet is a newer cellphone than Moto Z3 Play, although it's heavier and thicker. LG Velvet counts with a bit better processing power than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG Velvet also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG Velvet features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460px. The LG Velvet counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has more internal storage.
The LG Velvet has a way better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. LG Velvet shoots better photographs and videos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the LG Velvet also counts with a much bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and photos and a way more mega pixels camera.
The LG Velvet not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.