Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing has an overall score of 91.2, which is much better than the Moto Z3 Play's global score of 76.3. The LG Wing body is extremely newer, but notably heavier and way thicker than the Moto Z3 Play. LG Wing counts with a bit better looking display than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2460px resolution and a quite bigger display.
The LG Wing features a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Wing also has more RAM. The LG Wing features a much better storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has 256 GB internal memory.
The LG Wing has superior battery lifetime than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The LG Wing captures greater photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the LG Wing also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality and a way more mega pixels camera.
The LG Wing is a lot more expensive than Moto Z3 Play, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.