Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a bit better than Moto Z3 Play, with a overall score of 81.9 against 76.3. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's design is a lot newer, but thicker and a bit heavier than Moto Z3 Play. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a better resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels, a little bigger display and a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Motorola Moto Z3 Play features more storage to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z3 Play counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 44% greater battery size. Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes way better pictures and videos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a much more megapixels back facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.