Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 overall score. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much newer than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, it is much heavier and notably thicker. Moto Z3 Play has a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way better looking screen than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little bit lower pixel count in each display inch, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality, a way more MP back facing camera, higher video frame rates and a bigger aperture to take better photos in poorly lited situations.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has much more memory for apps and games than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.