Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is just a bit better than the Moto Z3 Play, with an 80.3 score against 76.3. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW body is a lot newer, but heavier and extremely thicker than the Moto Z3 Play. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a bit better processor than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a screen that is just as good as the Motorola Moto Z3 Play one, because although the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a little larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution, a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Motorola Moto Z3 Play features a greater storage to store more games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z3 Play also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a much better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it costs more than Moto Z3 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z3 Play. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Nokia 8 V 5G UW, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto Z3 Play, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.