Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9 PureView has a general score of 76.4, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play's score of 76.3. Even though Nokia 9 PureView is a better cellphone than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, it must be told that it is also just a little heavier and thicker. The Nokia 9 PureView has a little bit better screen than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a same size screen, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a greater number of pixels per inch of display.
Motorola Moto Z3 Play counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Nokia 9 PureView has a little faster processing unit than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Nokia 9 PureView counts with a camera that is very similar to Moto Z3 Play's camera, and although the Nokia 9 PureView has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and images and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and videos, they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video resolution and a camera in the back with a 12 MP.
The Nokia 9 PureView has just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it is more expensive than Moto Z3 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z3 Play. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Nokia 9 PureView, else you can save some money and buy the Moto Z3 Play, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.