Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a score of 80.8, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play's global score of 76.3. Nokia XR20's design is noticeably newer, but extremely heavier and way thicker than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play. Nokia XR20 counts with just a little better processing power than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia XR20 also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Moto Z3 Play counts with just a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Nokia XR20, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Nokia XR20 takes much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a larger sensor, faster video frame rates and a back facing camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a really longer battery duration than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4630mAh battery capacity.
Nokia XR20 is a little more expensive than Moto Z3 Play, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.