Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 Play is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, getting a 76.3 score against 76.2. Although Moto Z3 Play is extremely older than nubia Red Magic 5S, it's body is way thinner and incredibly lighter. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little bit better performance than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has 4 GB more RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a little sharper display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit bigger screen. Nubia Red Magic 5S takes much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, it also counts with a much bigger sensor, a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a lot better video quality.
Motorola Moto Z3 Play features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a way better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Moto Z3 Play is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the nubia Red Magic 5S, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.