Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, with a overall score of 79.4 against 76.3. Galaxy A35 5G is a way newer cellphone than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, although it is somewhat thicker and notably heavier. Galaxy A35 5G counts with just a bit better looking screen than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bit bigger display.
Moto Z3 Play has much more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Moto Z3 Play features a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a superior battery performance than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 67 percent more battery size. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a much better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking images and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a lot larger camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photos and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.