Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A41 is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, with an 81.7 score against 76.3. The Galaxy A41 design is newer and just a bit lighter than Motorola Moto Z3 Play's, but it's thicker. Galaxy A41 counts with a slightly better display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a bit bigger display and a little higher display density.
Motorola Moto Z3 Play counts with a superior storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A41, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z3 Play also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A41 counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto Z3 Play. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM.
The Galaxy A41 features a better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy A41 features a little better battery life than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.