Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is much better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, with an 86.6 score against 76.3. Samsung Galaxy A50s's design is newer than Motorola Moto Z3 Play's, although it is just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker. Samsung Galaxy A50s has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little larger screen, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little greater screen density.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a little bit better performance than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A50s takes much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos.
The Moto Z3 Play has a little bit more memory for apps and games than Galaxy A50s, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A50s features longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 33% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.