Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than Moto Z3 Play's score of 76.3. Even though the Galaxy A51 5G is newer than the Moto Z3 Play, it's heavier and extremely thicker. The Galaxy A51 5G features a slightly better screen than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little bit higher display pixel density, a bit bigger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has slightly more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a bit superior processor than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much longer battery life than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 50% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy A51 5G features a superior camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way more MP camera in the back and a much larger back-facing camera sensor.
Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.