Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is much better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, having a score of 91.3 against 76.3. Galaxy A52 5G is a extremely newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, although it's heavier and somewhat thicker. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a little bit better looking screen than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a just a bit greater screen density, a little bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Galaxy A52 5G shoots much better photos and videos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way bigger camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A52 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 50 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.