Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is much better than Moto Z3 Play, with a score of 91.1 against 76.3. The Galaxy A52s construction is extremely newer than the Moto Z3 Play's, but it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Galaxy A52s counts with a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little bit better pixel quantity in each inch in the display, a little bit bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A52s counts with a little bit more memory for apps and games than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has an external memory slot that supports 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A52s has a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52s also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A52s features a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A52s takes way better videos and photos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a much larger back camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs and a much more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.