Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a score of 76.9, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play's global score of 76.3. The Samsung Galaxy A70 is a newer device than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, but it is thicker and somewhat heavier. The Galaxy A70 has just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A70 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A70 and Motorola Moto Z3 Play count with similar screens, because although the Galaxy A70 has a just a little lower quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Motorola Moto Z3 Play captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto Z3 Play also has a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
Moto Z3 Play has a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A70, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A70 counts with a way better battery life than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.