Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 is better than Moto Z3 Play, with a general score of 87.5 against 76.3. Galaxy A71's design is newer than Moto Z3 Play's, but it's heavier and just a bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A71 and Motorola Moto Z3 Play both count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Galaxy A71 has a little lower amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Galaxy A71 features a way better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light images, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a way higher resolution camera.
Moto Z3 Play features a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A71 features a much longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy A71 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.