Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than Moto Z3 Play, with a score of 92.9 against 76.3. Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is newer than Moto Z3 Play, it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a slightly bigger storage to install games and applications than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a lot better camera than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a camera with way more megapixels and a much larger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a very superior battery duration than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW costs more than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.