Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F23 is better than Moto Z3 Play, having a overall score of 84.6 against 76.3. The Galaxy F23 body is much newer and way lighter, but also somewhat thicker than the Moto Z3 Play. Galaxy F23 has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy F23 features a little sharper display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2408 pixels and a bit bigger screen. The Moto Z3 Play has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a much less megapixels back camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in low light situations.
Moto Z3 Play features a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy F23 has a really longer battery lifetime than Moto Z3 Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.