Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 is much better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, getting an 85.2 score against 76.3. Samsung Galaxy F41's design is extremely newer, but notably thicker and somewhat heavier than Motorola Moto Z3 Play. Samsung Galaxy F41 features a little more vivid display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a bit greater pixel quantity per inch in the screen, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit bigger display.
Moto Z3 Play features a much better storage to install applications and games than Galaxy F41, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z3 Play also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy F41 counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy F41 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy F41 features a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a way more mega-pixels back camera and a much larger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy F41 has a way better battery life than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 100 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.