Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-06-29 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 global score. The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a notably newer cellphone than Moto Z3 Play, although it's incredibly thicker and a lot heavier. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a bit better screen than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a just a bit lower display density, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a slightly better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy F62 features just a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with more RAM.
Galaxy F62 captures way better videos and photos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality pictures and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much longer battery life than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.