Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 general score. The Galaxy Fold body has the same thickness than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, but it is heavier. Galaxy Fold features a screen that's very similar to the display in Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although the Galaxy Fold has a little bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a higher 1536 x 2152 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Fold features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Fold counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Fold features just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same sensor size, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a back facing camera with a 12 megapixels resolution, the Galaxy Fold also has better 60 fps video frame rate and a bigger aperture to take better photos and video in low light environments.
Galaxy Fold features a much longer battery performance than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 46 percent larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.